Forums › General Discussion › calling all windvanes
- This topic has 11 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 17 years, 7 months ago by
Tor.
-
AuthorPosts
-
-
March 22, 2009 at 3:21 pm #67425
Tor
ParticipantTo all who have a windvane on your 424:
Did you (and/or the original installer) feel it necessary to beef up the transom to take that kind of stress,
other than big backing plates for the mounting bolts? Has anyone used a windvane a lot and then discovered or
checked for any signs of stress on the transom?Thanks,
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 22, 2009 at 5:56 pm #72204
madsailor
ModeratorHI Tor,
I don't have any experience with my Monitor, but the backing plates seem to be no more than a big washer. There doesn't seem to be any problem with cracking or anything. For the Monitor, though, the forwardmost stern rail had parted from the foot plate due to the stress. I had a local welder put gussets so that wouldn't happen again and on both sides so that if one did break, I'd have the other to use.
In fact, I could fix the raw water pump now or go to West Marine and buy the line and stuff I need to make it work…
Bob
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Silver Heels < ([email][/email])> wrote:
To all who have a windvane on your 424:
Did you (and/or the original installer) feel it necessary to beef up the transom to take that kind of stress,
other than big backing plates for the mounting bolts? Has anyone used a windvane a lot and then discovered or
checked for any signs of stress on the transom?Thanks,
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ()
For additional commands, e-mail: ()—
Bob Fine
s/v Pelican
Hull #8Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 22, 2009 at 6:12 pm #72205
Tor
ParticipantBob,
How long has the Monitor been on your boat? Do you know whether the PO used it much? What is “the forwardmost stern rail?”
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Quote:
Original Message
<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 22, 2009 at 6:38 pm #72207
madsailor
ModeratorHi Tor,
The PO used it for about a year as they made their way from San Francisco to Rhode Island. They cruised the Caribbean for quite a while. The mostly used it with a tiller-pilot autopilot. But the vanes are here, both low and high wind ones.
If you follow the sternrail forward until it turns vertical and attaches to the coaming you'll see it's welded quite poorly to a circular piece. That piece takes all the strain from the lines from the Monitor which is considerable. Anyway, gussets fix the problem. A picture could be provided.
Bob
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Silver Heels < ([email][/email])> wrote:
Quote:Bob,
How long has the Monitor been on your boat? Do you know whether the PO used it much? What is “the forwardmost stern rail?”
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Quote:
Original Message
<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 22, 2009 at 7:04 pm #72209
Tor
ParticipantThanks, Bob. I think I get the idea. In any case, it doesn’t apply to the vane I’m installing.
Still hoping to hear from others with windvanes on 424’s regarding signs of stress on the transom. Maybe it’s a non-issue, but there’s nothing like a few thousand nautical miles to make it a certainty.
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Quote:
Original Message
<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 22, 2009 at 8:01 pm #72210
john stevensonParticipantTor,
I don't think it is an issue for most servo-pendulum vanes, such as my Monitor. The mounts for my Monitor are backed by 6″ square x 1/2″ thick Starboard pieces (had them as scraps on board when installing) along with the largest fender washers I could find. Used the vanes on two Atlantic crossings. Coming back we had nearly a week of gale force winds and seas > 8'. No signs of crazing or cracking. I do have crazing where the PO installed a boarding ladder on the transom, so I know the transom is not real strong. Ladder has been removed.I think the only way a servo-pendulum vane could crack the transom if the vane oar is hit something solid at good speed. I think whatever that might be would have taken out the rudder first so the vane and the transom would be the least of my worries.
With the Auxiliary rudder type vanes I would definitely beef up the transom. That's one of the reasons I went servo-pendulum and did not purchase the Monitor rudder feature (forget what Hans calls it).
All that said, it sure wouldn't hurt to beef up the transom in the area of the mounts.
John
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Silver Heels < ([email][/email])> wrote:
Quote:Thanks, Bob. I think I get the idea. In any case, it doesn't apply to the vane I'm installing.
Still hoping to hear from others with windvanes on 424's regarding signs of stress on the transom. Maybe it's a non-issue, but there's nothing like a few thousand nautical miles to make it a certainty.
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Quote:
Original Message
<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 22, 2009 at 9:16 pm #72212
Tor
ParticipantVery good information, John. Thanks. I am installing an Auto-Helm windvane, which includes an independent rudder (with trimtab) bolted to the transom. I don’t know how severe the stresses will be or how the transom will handle them. I think I’ll just heavily back the thru-bolts area for now, and then keep an eye on it. It’s easy enough to add layers of ‘glass later if I find the transom is flexing under load.
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Quote:
Original Message
<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 23, 2009 at 1:01 am #72215
Syringa
ParticipantSyringa’s vane did not come with her so I don’t know what type she had. But she has some major cracking on the upper vane mount showing she went through some high stress at one time on her crossing of the South Pacific. All her vane mounts are backed with 6″ X 6″ 1/2″ Plywood bedded with 5200. If I were to re-install a vane I would add at least two layers of 24 oz woven roving and use full width 1″ X 8″ oak plank backing boards.
-
March 23, 2009 at 10:01 am #72217
Tor
ParticipantAha! That’s just the feedback I was looking for (and didn’t want to hear). It confirms my suspicions. Thanks, Don. Guess I’ll have to deal with it now.
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Original Message
<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 23, 2009 at 12:12 pm #72219
madsailor
ModeratorThere's only one other thing to consider – what kind of windvane was it and did the damage occur from use or from accident? I know that it's darn easy to back into a dock or have the boat swing or any number of things that would cause the structure to torque, compress, or both causing the kind of damage Don mentions. That said, backing a bolt with something strong is never a bad idea. It needn't be an onerous job, either, especially if you have a recycled metal place nearby. You can use 1/4″ aluminum plate as a backing with 5200 adhesive and it will be far stronger than any stress you can put there (except, of course, backing into a dock, boat, quay, pier, jetty or groin). You can use a standard circular saw or table saw with a carbide blade to cut it and it's super easy to do.
I don't happen to like wood as a backing that much because it can work and compress over a period of time requiring re-tightening. For thru-hulls, fine, but not for variably stressed items. My humble opinion, though.
My two cents again.
Bob
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Silver Heels < ([email][/email])> wrote:
Quote:Aha! That's just the feedback I was looking for (and didn't want to hear). It confirms my suspicions. Thanks, Don. Guess I'll have to deal with it now.
Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Original Message
<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 23, 2009 at 11:19 pm #72223
Anonymous
We installed a Sailomat, which has a single plate mounted in the center of the transom with four bolts, on Easy Reach. The first thing I noticed was oil-canning of the transom.
After some thought, I insgtalled two 1/8 by 2 inch Al bars vertical behind the bolts to stiffen the transom. This worked for several years until we sold the Sailomat to another cruiser. The unit was great at sea, especially off Belize catching the trades, where the wind was fairly constant, but a pain in the neck on the Great Lakes and close to shore with variable winds. We put in a new AutoHelm under cockpit which works nicely, not drawing anywhere the current our old one did. And with the new 150 amp Balmar dedicated to the house bank of four golfcarts, it meets our current needs.
Norris Larson, #203
— On Sun, 3/22/09, Silver Heels <> wrote:
Quote:<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
March 24, 2009 at 12:07 am #72226
Tor
ParticipantNorris,
I’ve also concluded that the transom needs strengthening to handle a
windvane and am proceeding accordingly (see attached). Thanks for your
feedback.Tor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Silver Heels, P-424 #17
http://www.SilverHeels.us
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Original Message
<.. snip>Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum
-
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.