Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 878 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Material of sole subfloor? #75278
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Pete,
    I don’t know CCA for non-CCA, but clearly the sub-floor plywood I removed
    during my cabin sole hatch project this spring was not marine grade. That
    is, if my knowledge of marine grade is correct – zero voids.
    In any case I had to replace one section of the hatch subfloor and I used
    MDO plywood. I’ll let you know in 10 year or less if that was a good idea.

    On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Pete Dubler <> wrote:

    I am in Fort Collins, Colorado. My boat is here for a several year
    restoration. (It is a Blue Water Sailing project boat and you can follow
    the project in their magazine starting this summer with an article on
    trucking the boat out here).

    Pete

    On 4/29/2010 7:04 PM, Patrick “Peaboy” Walters wrote:

    Use Marine grade plywood….
    Pete, where do you live? I might be able to help you find it.

    -p

    —
    s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 Hull #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com

    On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Pete Dubler<>
    wrote:

    I need to buy some plywood to replace the big hole in the sole I made
    glassing in the new fuel tank. The question is: what is this stuff?

    Is it CCA marine grade doug fir plywood or just CCA (non-marine) plywood,
    or something else.

    What are people using these days? I can find CCA plywood (non-marine)
    for
    about $32/sheet and I can find marine grade, not CCA plywood for about
    $97 a
    sheet. In any case, I need about a 48 x 48 piece of the right stuff.
    (the
    CCA 3/4 marine ply sells at the coast for about $65/sheet, but I can’t
    find
    it here). I wonder if you can just put a shipping label on a 4′ square
    piece and send it via UPS….

    Knowledge and ideas?

    Thanks,

    Pete

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: FW: Where’s the lead? #75250
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Tor,
    The only 424 owner I know who has tied his ground plane into the lead in the
    keel is Jack Tyler on Whoosh. I don’t know where he attached it, you can
    email him at . He is very satisfied with his rig, but I
    don’t know how much of that he attributes to the keel.
    They should be about 1,000nm out of the Marquesa today. They pick up emails
    about once a day.

    On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Alan <> wrote:

    Quote:
    “This will be fed with COAX”
    I think most experts will agree that the tuner to ant. connection should be
    fed with GTO-15 High Tension wire. That wire can be bought at any neon sign
    shop or any HAM radio outlet.
    It should be kept as short as possible as it is included in the antenna
    length calculations.

    alan

    — On Wed, 4/28/10, Patrick “Peaboy” Walters <>
    wrote:

    <.. snip>

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Getting closer on the heat issue for the w58 #75228
    john stevenson
    Participant

    I guess I’m still a skeptic on the fresh water pump being the culprit. I’m
    certainly no expert, but I believe the things that normally can fail are the
    seals and the bearings, both of which produce external symptoms – leaks in
    the case of the seals, or noise and vibration in the case of the bearings.
    BTW, does the engine overheat without putting it under load?

    On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Pete Dubler <> wrote:

    The sea water pump on the W58 is really too small for the engine. Mine
    was replaced with a larger Sherwood pump on a stainless steel bracket with a
    large aluminum pulley. Moved a good bit more water. I still have that
    whole outfit, including a spare pump, left over from my re-power, if you are
    interested in going that way.

    Rebuilding water pumps is really quite easy. The seals are removed, the
    bearings pressed out (a socket and hammer works in the stead of a press),
    the shaft polished up a bit with very fine emery paper, the wedge and
    o-rings replaced, and you basically have a new pump. The rebuild kits come
    in two or three degrees, depending on your pump. The largest kit includes a
    new shaft. Call Depco for the kit or shop around for it online. Or just
    get the bearings and seals (plus O-rings) at your local bearing store and
    order the wedge from Depco. Buying a new pump is a waste of money when
    rebuilding is so easy.

    Hope this helps.

    Pete

    On 4/27/2010 10:51 PM, james bartch wrote:

    Aloha to All

    Thank you for the advice, i am getting closer to the problem. it has to
    be on the coolant or fresh water side. I am suspecting that the fresh water
    pump may be bad but… is there a good check to make sure. i am not sure
    which hose to pull to make sure the pump is actually pumping coolant thru
    the system.

    symptom: after i fill the engine with coolant and run it for a while, put
    it under a load, cap off and shut it down it spits out coolant, does not
    appear to be cycling coolant thru the system or coolant appears to be backed
    up and then overflows after the engine heats up.

    i am thinking that it may be the pump, i see on line that these fresh
    water pumps can be re built, is that the best way to go?

    I have not pulled the pump or checked the hoses that go to and from the
    pump yet, just wanted to see if a hose can be removed to check flow on the
    outlet side of the pump, but not sure.

    thank you in advance for the help, you guys are great!

    S/V Island Muse #217

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: ground vs. ground #75213
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Tor,
    I haven’t attempted to join two pieces of foil together, but I think I would
    put some solder in that fold to make sure your get a strong connection.

    On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Silver Heels <> wrote:

    Quote:
    Hey John,

    When it comes to electrical stuff, the devil is often in the terminology –
    at least, for me. I thought radials were some kind of improved car tire…
    that roll on the “ground”. 🙂

    Wow, that copper strap dissolves like Alka Seltzer in hot water. I ran my
    3″
    strap over the top of the fuel tank, down to its first thru-hull
    connection,
    and then forward along what has so far always been dry areas in the upper
    bilge. Will have to remember to inspect it from time to time, though. And
    speaking of strap runs, I need to splice two sections of 3″ copper strap
    together. I figured I’ll just place them together end to end and fold them
    several times so that the 3″ width remains continuous. Is there a more
    correct way?

    Tor
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Silver Heels, P-424 #17
    http://www.SilverHeels.us
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Quote:

    Original Message


    <.. snip>

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: ground vs. ground #75210
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Tor,
    At the risk of giving you more options than you want or need, you might
    consider installing radials for your RF ground plane instead of or in
    addition to the copper foil. That is what I’m running off after having
    great difficulty getting good connections to Winlink and SailMail on our way
    to the Azores in 2005. When we were in Horta a friend (who had installed
    the copper foil ground for me) suggested adding radials to SGC ground. He
    provided all sorts of suggestions on lengths (1/2 the wavelength of the
    primary frequency) and material (12 AWG primary wire) to use, none of which
    helped. I had some excess 1″ copper braid on board, so we strung a couple
    of radials of arbitrary lengths off the SGC – one horizontal below the deck
    back to the stern, the other athwart-ships down under the fuel tank, all of
    this in the Port Cockpit locker. My crew was in the locker moving the
    radials around while I tested several frequencies looking for decent SWR
    readings. Eventually we found the arrangement that worked decently and I’ve
    been running off that arrangement ever since.
    This spring I discovered why the original copper foil ground plane did not
    work so well. When I had hatches cut into the cabin sole under the table I
    finally had access to the one area where the foil could not be secured to
    the hull. Here is what it looked like:
    http://www.svsarah.com/Sarah/Images/TableHatch8.JPG.
    Salt water from removing and replacing the knotmeter sender collected on top
    of the copper foil and dissolved it. So if you are installing foil make
    sure you keep it out of the way of any saltwater or seal it with something
    (e.g., epoxy)

    John

    On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:53 AM, <> wrote:

    Quote:
    My comment was about connecting the DC ground to the RF ground plane. The
    radio equipment typically connects them internally. In theory, it would be
    possible to put in a transformer that would separate them, but I see no
    advantage. Sorry if my discussion was confusing. The subject of RF ground
    planes is too complicated to explain in a short mail message. My suggestion
    is to have someone who is qualified advise you on how to hook this stuff up.

    With regard to the AC ground (green-wire in your shore power cord), I do
    not have my DC ground connected to this. I don’t want stray AC current
    getting into my shaft zincs.

    Rich


    Original Message


    <.. snip>

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: W 58 still heating up, any suggestions on what to check #75192
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Also check the hoses to the hot water heater (assuming you heat water with
    the engine). Unless you have a diverter valve to control the flow to the
    water heater (my W60 did not), an air lock in these hose can restrict or
    shut down the water flow through the heat exchanger. Whenever I drained the
    coolant on my W60 I used to pour coolant into one of the disconnected heater
    hoses untill it flowed solidly out of the other, then reattached the hoses
    to the engine.

    On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 2:15 AM, Patrick “Peaboy” Walters <
    > wrote:

    When you checked the heat exchanger did you pull the end cap and look into
    it? When I took my boat for it’s first test sail we overheated about 100yds
    outside the breakwater. Heat Exchanger was gummed up.

    -p

    —
    s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 Hull #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com

    On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 11:01 PM, james bartch <

    wrote:

    Aloha to All

    My w-58 is still heating up even after i have checked the obvious, any
    suggestions on what else i can check before i call in the machanic? new
    impeller, changed the thermostat, cleared the lines and looked for

    impeller

    pieces, have water flow out the discharge, cleaned the raw water

    strainer,

    checked the heat exchanger as best i know how, checked the oil

    cooler-heat

    exchanger and have no obvious external leaking.

    I can strart the engine run it for about 30 imnutes or so, under a load

    and

    then it starts to creep over 180 and i shut it down as it nears 200 +/-

    any thing else that i can check? the engine runs smooth and does not

    appear

    to have any coolant or oil coming out of the discharge, the oil is clear

    in

    the engine, trans and v drive… coolant is clean.

    please help!

    the engine is supposed to be a 1995 series w58, but not sure of that,
    survey indicates so with serial numbers.

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Rig Tensioning #75184
    john stevenson
    Participant

    The new Loos gauges almost justify the price by allowing you to monitor the
    tension while making adjustments to the turnbuckles. I’m glad I bit the
    bullet 5 years ago and purchased one.

    On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Jubilee <> wrote:

    thanks for all the information. We were looking at the Loos and was
    wondering if it was going to be worth the outlay of funds. I’m more apt to
    buy it now. thanks

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Rig Tensioning #75167
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Generally the rule is 15% of the breaking strength of the wire for the upper
    shrouds and fore and backstays. 10% of breaking strength for the lower.
    That gets you started with the mast in column. Then tune the rest of the
    way under sail.

    On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Jubilee <> wrote:

    Jubilee is getting her mast re-stepped after 1 1/2 years out of the water.
    Does anyone know what the proper tension is for the cutter rig?

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: LEDs for Aft and V-Bearth Lights #75108
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Thanks, Bob – that’s good to know.

    On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Robert Fine wrote:

    Hi John,

    Those spots can use the Dr LED bulbs – I use them in mine – all you have to
    do is shave a bit off the circumference of the bulb and it fits in. The
    tough part is having enough friction with your fingertips to allow you to
    turn the bulb.

    Bob

    On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:49 AM, John Stevenson <

    wrote:

    These are small spot lights that were original equipment over the head of
    the aft bunk and on each side of the berth in the forward cabin. They

    have

    a bayonet base, but the throat of the bulb is much longer than a standard
    bayonet bulb of the same base diameter. So those DrLED bulbs will not

    fit

    the fixture. I’ve looked for years for a LED replacement with no

    success,

    so I’ll be really interested if someone has found one.
    These are difficult to find bulbs even in the incandescent form, although
    WM
    does stock them (usually requires an order against the warehouse).
    If you want to go LED, I think the only option is to replace the fixture
    with one designed for LED or designed for one of the standard bulb
    configuration for which there is a readily available LED (e.g., halogen
    G4). I did replace the fixtures in the forward cabin with ones designed
    for
    LED, but they give very poor light. It’s a difficult location to put an
    effective reading light, which is what I assume the spot light was

    intended

    for. So I’m still looking for a LED-ready fixture that will work in that
    location.

    On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Patrick “Peaboy” Walters <
    > wrote:

    That is a bayonette type bulb. Can you send a pic of the fixture as

    well.

    -p

    On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Indulgence

    wrote:

    Hello,

    I’ve been having some issues post to the list:

    I have put up a picture of the bulb I am trying to replace….is this

    the

    same bulb that you found a replacement for…look at that light bulb

    here:

    http://drop.io/pearson424

    I have not been able to find an LED with similar dimensions.

    Suggestions?


    John Sommer
    Indulgence #179
    Portland, ME

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —

    s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 Hull #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Bob Fine
    s/v Pelican
    Pearson 424 Hull #8
    http://thesailinglife.blogspot.com
    Follow me at: http://www.tinyurl.com/WhereIsBobFine
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: LEDs for Aft and V-Bearth Lights #75105
    john stevenson
    Participant

    These are small spot lights that were original equipment over the head of
    the aft bunk and on each side of the berth in the forward cabin. They have
    a bayonet base, but the throat of the bulb is much longer than a standard
    bayonet bulb of the same base diameter. So those DrLED bulbs will not fit
    the fixture. I’ve looked for years for a LED replacement with no success,
    so I’ll be really interested if someone has found one.
    These are difficult to find bulbs even in the incandescent form, although WM
    does stock them (usually requires an order against the warehouse).
    If you want to go LED, I think the only option is to replace the fixture
    with one designed for LED or designed for one of the standard bulb
    configuration for which there is a readily available LED (e.g., halogen
    G4). I did replace the fixtures in the forward cabin with ones designed for
    LED, but they give very poor light. It’s a difficult location to put an
    effective reading light, which is what I assume the spot light was intended
    for. So I’m still looking for a LED-ready fixture that will work in that
    location.

    On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 2:02 AM, Patrick “Peaboy” Walters <
    > wrote:

    That is a bayonette type bulb. Can you send a pic of the fixture as well.

    -p

    On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Indulgence wrote:

    Hello,

    I’ve been having some issues post to the list:

    I have put up a picture of the bulb I am trying to replace….is this the
    same bulb that you found a replacement for…look at that light bulb

    here:

    http://drop.io/pearson424

    I have not been able to find an LED with similar dimensions.

    Suggestions?


    John Sommer
    Indulgence #179
    Portland, ME

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —

    s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 Hull #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: bimini & windvane on ketch? #75102
    john stevenson
    Participant

    I’d be interested to see how that works as well. There’s gotta be something
    more than shock cord holding the pieces of the vane together. Otherwise it
    would seem that the top of the vane would bend off to leeward making it less
    effective – I must be missing something.

    On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Silver Heels <> wrote:

    Quote:
    That sounds like a smart arrangement, Norris. I’d love to see some photos
    of
    it.

    Tor
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Silver Heels, P-424 #17
    http://www.SilverHeels.us
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Quote:

    Original Message


    <.. snip>

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: bimini & windvane? #75093
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Pat,
    My Monitor works with a Bimini over the cockpit, and my Bimini is fairly
    high so I (6′ 1″) can stand erect under it. The secret is the Monitor comes
    with a tall vane, which senses the wind above the Bimini. The top of the
    vane is the part that drives the gear. If you get the Bimini designed for
    your height there should be no problem. All bets are off if Dave can stand
    under it :).
    The only air flow problem I’ve had is once when I had furled the mizzen and
    sheeted the boom to leeward. Then we tacked and I forgot to tack the mizzen
    boom. All of a sudden the Monitor wouldn’t steer worth a darn. It was
    night and under the Bimini I wasn’t aware of the mizzen boom being to
    windward of the vane. With daylight I finally figured it out, tacked the
    boom to leeward and the Monitor was its old self again.

    On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 3:47 PM, pat noordsij <> wrote:

    This is a question for those folks with biminis and windvanes or biminis
    and no windvanes or the other way around.

    Does it work? Does the windvane see the wind with the binimi? Please let
    us know about your experiences ..

    – pat
    SV Doris E, p424 #178

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Cleaned up 424 Drawing #75080
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Thanks, Patrick.
    That’s a lot cleaner than the one I did a few years ago.

    On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:53 PM, Patrick “Peaboy” Walters <
    > wrote:

    I cleaned up the P424 line drawing from the specs brochure. I have a full
    Photoshop CS4 version if anyone wants it. Here’s a .jpg
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/deepplaya/4463279053/

    -p

    —

    s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 Hull #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Regards,
    John Stevenson
    http://www.svsarah.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    https://pearson424.org/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Propeller Shaft Length #75058
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Rich,
    Like you I don't run in idle, just when putting the engine in gear and changing gear.  I immediately power up to at least 1000 RPM even when maneuvering out of the anchorage or dock.  I do get vibration under way at around 1500, then it smooths out at 1800-2000 – my normal cruising RPMs at 6.5 – 7.0 kts.  On my way back to New Bern tomorrow (about 25nm up the Neuse) I'll experiment with RPMs and see if anything has changed.

    On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:44 PM, < ([email][/email])> wrote:

    Quote:
    John
    Odd that you have vibration at idle speed.  I don't think I run the engine in gear at idle so I can't comment.  I have a folding prop, so idle isn't a good choice.  According to my seatrial notes, I'd be doing 2.5 kts at idle.  I need to run at at least 1000 RPM for the alternator and refrigeration compressor to work right.  That's about 3kts.  I've got a lower gear ration in my V-drive, so you're pushing the prop a little harder at low speed.  I don't think I ever run the engine at idle unless I'm shifting gears.

    From my experience, if I'm just slightly out of alignment, the boat will vibrate at high speed, about 1000 shaft RPM.  With a 2:1 gear reduction for a typical RV-20, that would be about 2000 engine RPM, maybe a little less depending on how far out you are.  That's probably at about 6.7 to 7.0 kts depending on sea-state.  As I recall, it would smooth out if I backed off to about 6.5kts.  With the alignment correct, the boat runs pretty smooth all the way up to hull speed.

    Rich


    Original Message


    <.. snip>

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Propeller Shaft Length #75053
    john stevenson
    Participant

    Thanks, Rich.
    I've started my research on this subject with your web-site.  Interesting, the greatest vibration I get is in gear at idle throttle.  When I increase the throttle to 1000 RPM the vibration goes away.  This makes me believe this condition has been there for a long time.  The W60 idled at 1100 and may have been masking the vibration.  I never noticed it until the Yanmar repower, which idles at around 700.

    On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:45 PM, < ([email][/email])> wrote:

    John,

    From my experience, even though the gap is small, you may have some vibration at high shaft speeds.  I think .003 is within the V-drive alignment tolerance, but its almost impossible to get the darn thing aligned that close as it is.  If you add .003 to your best effort, I think you'll be out of spec.  

    As discussed in great length, the RV-26 is not a direct drop-in replacement.  I agree that its not practical to toss money at the old RV-20 since the cases are no longer available so you're stuck.  Once you replace the thing, you should be home-free.  Feel free to call me if you have problems retro-fitting the v-drive.  I think the most difficult part was removing the ole splined shaft from the jack-shaft.  You'll be tossing the old splined shaft.  If it won't budge, Weld a bolt to the end of the thing and slip a pipe down its length.  Then drop a washer over it and a nut.  Tighten the nut to pull the shaft out.

    Regards
    Rich


    Original Message


    <.. snip>

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 878 total)