Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 1,627 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: LinkPro Installation #77859
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Ok, then as long as the engine ground goes to the shunt, you’re good to go.

    Bob

    I’m not being terse. This is from my mobile.
    On Oct 12, 2011 1:59 PM, “Alan” wrote:

    Quote:
    My alternator had a separate grounding terminal, but it’s for the voltage
    regulator ground. The alternator is indeed case grounded, else you would
    need a grounding cable as big as the positive cable…… and this grounding
    terminal is only for a small gauge wire.
    alan

    — On Wed, 10/12/11, Robert Fine wrote:

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: LinkPro Installation #77857
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Well said, Alan. True, dat. Also, I am concerned that you have to connect to
    a bonding point for stuff to work. That’s absolutely wrong.

    Bob

    I’m not being terse. This is from my mobile.
    On Oct 12, 2011 1:55 PM, “Alan” wrote:

    Quote:
    Very simply stated…. if you want the LinkPro to measure battery usage, it
    must go through the shunt. If the particular object does not go through the
    shunt, but is directly connected to the battery, it will work, but it’s
    current usage will not be registered by the LinkPro.
    So, things like the starter and fuel solenoid, which are case grounded, use
    the grounding wire (BIG black cable). In your case, if that big cable is not
    connected to the shunt. They will continue to operate, but their current
    usage will not be shown on the LinkPro.
    Thats my understanding. YMMV
    Alan

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: LinkPro Installation #77855
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Hi Pat, there is something very wrong going on here. You need a grounding
    buss that all your loads go to, including the engine ground. From there, one
    wire to the shunt and one wire from the shunt to the batteries.

    Normally, alternator cases are grounded by the bolts that hold them in
    place, and no wire goes separately to the battery grounds. If it does in
    your case, put it to the buss bar I mentioned earlier.

    One thing that may be confusing the issue here is that a connection anywhere
    on a wire is the same as anywhere else. That may help you simplify what
    you’re trying to see in your head.

    Bob

    I’m not being terse. This is from my mobile.
    On Oct 12, 2011 1:43 PM, “Patrick "Peaboy" Walters” <
    > wrote:

    I was just talking to the Xantrex folks and they don’t seem to understand
    the wiring I have.

    My batteries have various LOADs using the negative posts instead of a
    busterminal strip. No real problem there in my current installation.
    My alternator is NOT case grounded. It has it’s own Negative wire back to
    the batteries.
    I also have a wire that goes form Negative to my engine block.

    When I install the shunt for the LinkPro, all of the LOADS (in or out)
    Negative wires need to go on one post of the shunt and the battery Negative
    on the other post.

    So the question is, what is that wire that goes to my engine block? Seems
    like’s part of the NEG of my system and my bonding as well. Because when we
    had the engine out, if I didn’t hok that wire to the bonding wire to the
    post on the prop strut under the engine I could not run any DC loads.

    So, given that should that wire go on the Load side of the shunt?

    I love when I call tech support and they don’t have any clue either. 😉
    Thanks!
    -p

    —
    s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 Hull #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com | @DeepPlaya
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    http://server12.websitehostserver.net/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    http://server12.websitehostserver.net/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: One Eighty #77845
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Maybe, although I didn’t see the other mods.

    I’m not being terse. This is from my mobile.
    On Oct 11, 2011 12:20 PM, “Patrick” wrote:

    Is this the boat.
    https://www.pearson424.org/gallery/index.php/Interior-Modifications/album01

    -p

    Sent from my iPad

    On Oct 11, 2011, at 6:03 AM, Robert Fine wrote:

    Hi All,

    I’m in the middle of a delivery to Charleston and who should I spy in
    Beautort, NC but One Eighty, Charles and Quentin’s 424. They’ve just
    brought the boat from the Great Lakes to the Hudson to Norfolk to here.
    Welcome them!

    One Eighty is in terrific shape and I hope Charles sends a picture of

    what

    they or the PO did to the nav station (hint, it’s a big hanging locker
    now).

    Anyway, that’s the news for today.

    Bob

    —
    Bob Fine
    s/v Pelican
    Pearson 424 Hull #8
    http://thesailinglife.blogspot.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    http://server12.websitehostserver.net/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    http://server12.websitehostserver.net/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    http://server12.websitehostserver.net/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Antifreeze change -W58 #77840
    madsailor
    Moderator

    I had to replace my antifreeze so I used the Blue Oceans one from West
    Marine – it’s polypropylene glycol instead of ethylene glycol so isn’t bad
    for the environment. It meets or exceeds all manufacturer’s specifications
    (or so it says on the jug). No matter what you use, you should expect to
    change it every two years. The anti-corrosion additives don’t last any
    longer than that anyway.

    Bob

    On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Rodd Leeds wrote:

    Time to renew my old antifreeze on my W58. I have always used the plain
    green Prestone. Now I wonder if it might make sense to use the new Extended
    Life Prestone which presumably gives longer protection. Anyone have
    experience using this Prestone product?
    They say it has no silicates or phosphates and is safe for aluminum?

    Rodd Leeds
    Windseeker
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    http://server12.websitehostserver.net/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    —
    Bob Fine
    s/v Pelican
    Pearson 424 Hull #8
    http://thesailinglife.blogspot.com
    _______________________________________________
    maillist mailing list

    http://server12.websitehostserver.net/mailman/listinfo/maillist_pearson424.org

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: leak #77834
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Interesting question. Because I can’t reach it. If I could, I’d put a layer
    of woven roving there.

    Bob

    I’m not being terse. This is from my mobile.
    On Oct 9, 2011 11:19 AM, “Silverheels” wrote:

    Quote:
    Bob,

    I’m sure what you did is strong enough, but why not also build up some
    ‘glass on the inside, on the floor of the sump?

    Tor


    Silverheels, P-424 #17
    http://www.silverheels.us


    Quote:

    Original Message


    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: leak #77831
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Hi Lee,

    Here’s what I did – I was at a yard that did no launching on weekends so
    they hung Pelican on Friday afternoon. First, I ground out the soft
    fiberglass at the base of the keel behind the ballast until I got to dry
    glass laminate – I ground it in a ‘V’ shape with the narrow end up. The
    width of the hole inside the boat was about 1″ for a distance of about 2
    feet, or most of the bottom of the sump. The width at the outside was about
    4″ and I ground another few inches around the hole.

    Then, I put one layer of cloth across the hole and let it set up so I didn’t
    end up pushing all the stuff into the bilge. After that, I just laid up
    layer after layer until it was even with the bottom outside. Then I
    overlaid it in a couple of layers that overlapped edges I ground beyond the
    hole.

    After it all set up, I sanded it smooth, painted and went into the water.
    It took two days to do the job mostly because I had to wait between layers
    for set up.

    It’s not hard, just time consuming.

    Bob

    On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Lee Yonkers wrote:

    Quote:
    Bob,
    I’d like to know just what you had to do to make the repair.
    I have hull number 43.

    Lee

    ________________________________

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: leak #77829
    madsailor
    Moderator

    I wouldn’t be surprised if yours was thicker. I notice newer 424s have lots
    of differences that sometimes are for the better, sometimes not. Thicker
    keels are better, in my opinion.

    I forget Lee’s hull number.

    Bob

    I’m not being terse. This is from my mobile.
    On Oct 9, 2011 8:06 AM, “Silverheels” wrote:

    Quote:
    I believe you, Bob, but I still can’t imagine water seeping through 1/2″
    of fiberglass. (BTW, my boat, #17, seems to be thicker than that at that
    point.) Perhaps that seam you mention opened up to become a crack. Not
    good, but I guess as long as the ballast doesn’t slip out through it
    we’ll make it to port.

    🙂


    Original Message


    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: leak #77827
    madsailor
    Moderator

    When mine leaked, it was about 1/2 inch and there is a seam there from the
    forms. It is, traditionally a weak spot. I didn’t know how weak until I had
    to grind mine out. I found the leak from the inside out.

    Bob

    I’m not being terse. This is from my mobile.
    On Oct 9, 2011 7:22 AM, “Silverheels” wrote:

    Quote:
    Bob,

    Your boat leaked through the fiberglass of the keel’s foot, just abaft
    the ballast? No hole or crack? Water just seeped through the layers of
    ‘glass? How thin was it at that point?

    Quote:

    Original Message


    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: leak #77825
    madsailor
    Moderator

    The section of keel between the aft edge and the ballast is very weak. Of
    it’s leaking there as mine was the repair is simple but messy requiring
    hauling the boat and working on it in the slings.

    Bob

    I’m not being terse. This is from my mobile.
    On Oct 8, 2011 10:44 PM, “Patrick "Peaboy" Walters” <
    > wrote:

    Maybe there was a barrel of vodka glassed into your keel and its leaking!
    Now you can drink it!

    -p

    —
    s/v Deep Playa | Pearson 424 Hull #152 | http://www.DeepPlaya.com | @DeepPlaya

    On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Pete Dubler wrote:

    Good thinking Joe.

    Taste the water. Is it fresh (chlorinated) or salty?

    On 10/8/2011 6:16 PM, joe shimkonis wrote:

    Did you have your water pressure on? I had a pin hole leak in one of the
    tubings to the shower and behind the shower.I only discovered it when it

    got

    bad enough to make a hissing noise.Figure out if the leak is city water

    or

    salt water.I agree with “Tonto” that with a prop shaft penetrating the
    hull,a rudder post,thru hulls,itis probably a leakyfitting as opposed to

    a

    leak in the hull or keel.All my leaks adding water to the bilge have

    been

    either rain water,water pressure system,or tubing connections bringing

    salt

    water into the boat for the head,AC,or Refrig cooling,or over filling

    the

    Quote:
    Quote:
    water tanks.

    ______________________________**__

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: leak #77811
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Hi Lee,

    Neither am I. I have water in the bilge all the time. It comes from all
    over the place. But the pumps keep it under control. The weak spot,
    however, is between the ballast and the aft end of the keel. There’s next
    to nothing there and if you’ve been blocked there, you’ve been compromised.
    It’s really a bit stupid to make such a weak spot.

    Bob

    On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Silverheels wrote:

    Quote:
    I’m not clear on where in the bilge you’re talking about, Lee. Where
    does the bilge begin to level out? Are you talking about the deep sump
    area aft, somewhere forward near the mainmast step, or the stepped-down
    flat area in between?

    Tor


    Silverheels, P-424 #17
    http://www.silverheels.us


    Quote:

    Original Message


    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: MPPT Charge controller feature comparison #77787
    madsailor
    Moderator

    And bird doo. Apparently solar panels look like targets to birds.

    Bob

    On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Alan wrote:

    Quote:
    Tor,
    The newer panels are much better at producing a good output even with
    shadows. It’s the way the individual cells are made and wired together. The
    older panels, not so much. My panels came with the boat, so I know they are
    not as effiecent as the newer ones.
    I do know that any panel, must be kept clean of dirt, dust and salt spray –
    so keep a bottle of Windex handy.
    Alan

    — On Sat, 10/1/11, Silverheels wrote:

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: MPPT Charge controller feature comparison #77776
    madsailor
    Moderator

    I may have mentioned this, but I have 2 – 135 watt panels, one on the dodger
    and one on the davits. Neither is movable but are sort of flat. During (or
    after, really) Hurricane Irene when we lost power for two days the panels
    provided all of ships power (except water heating – I used the generator for
    that). Down south, below about North Carolina, one panel did the job pretty
    well requiring running the engine every 4 days or so. I expect it will be
    longer with both panels. Except for hot water, which I really, really like.

    Anyway, if the 270 watts isn’t enough, I can rotate the one on the davits 90
    degrees and add one more. When I met my friends at Key West, they had three
    panels and had to waste power – bread maker, rice maker, etc. I am all
    about solar panels. Although, I have to say it’s been raining here for the
    last two years, it feels like. Really, two weeks. But there’s been no
    wind, either. Feh.

    Bob

    2011/9/30 Alan

    Quote:
    I have better pics someplace – If I can find em – If not I can get more
    next week when on the boat.
    Alan

    — On Fri, 9/30/11, Silverheels wrote:

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Overcharging problems #77750
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Hi Pat,

    Alan is correct. Use the house bank for monitoring and charging, using the
    ACR to charge the start battery. After all, you can start the engine with
    the house bank, I hope, but not run ship’s loads with the engine start
    battery.

    Also, make sure you have all the same type of batteries. Don’t do flooded
    for engine start and AGM for house. You may have mentioned the types, so
    this could be an unuseful comment.

    Good luck. It’s good to have 660 hours – I have that (almost) in 3 – 4D
    batteries and seldom go much below about 80% charged – with the new solar
    panels, not even that. I have two group 31s for emergency start and radio
    operation. Normally, I use the house bank exclusively with the other tested
    by starting the engine whenever I think about it.

    Bob

    On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:33 AM, Alan wrote:

    Quote:
    I have always have had the Alternator charging the house bank – it’s the
    biggest need.
    When you think about it, you only crank the start battery for a few seconds
    and really don’t take much power from it. SO .. I set it up to charge the
    house bank – the ACR is set up to turn ON when it sees a voltage condition
    from the Alternator over a certain level. Because the sense wire is on the
    house bank. When that happens, the contacts close and charges the starting
    battery “at the same time”.
    Probably 100% of the time the house bank is going to be at a much lower
    level (discharged) then the starting battery ( unless your really cranking
    and having trouble starting the engine. In which case your probably going to
    be using the battery switch to combine the the house bank and starting bank
    anyhow.
    Alan

    — On Sun, 9/25/11, Patrick “Peaboy” Walters
    wrote:

    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

    in reply to: Deck rot around mast hole #77744
    madsailor
    Moderator

    Maybe…. But probably not.

    On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Silverheels wrote:

    Quote:
    You’re my uncle?


    Original Message


    Post generated from Pearson424 Forum using Mail2Forum

Viewing 15 posts - 451 through 465 (of 1,627 total)